Resource Library

The Resource Library contains a collection of higher education learning and teaching materials flowing from projects funded by the Commonwealth of Australia including those from the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Results may be sorted filtered by keywords.

40 resources found.

Enhancing and Assessing Group and Team Learning in Architecture and Related Design Contexts

Richard Tucker, Neda Abbasi, Graham R. Thorpe, Michael J. Ostwald, Anthony P. Williams, Louise Wallis, Sam Kashuk
Deakin University
2014
Deakin University
The University of Newcastle, University of Tasmania, Victoria University
Final Report Download Document (1.87 MB)

Assessing Group Work in Media and Communication

Greg Battye, Ian Hart, Coralie McCormack, Peter Donnan
University of Canberra
2008
University of Canberra

In Media and Communications, authentic tasks are the basis of learning through assessment. Media production in the real world is almost always a collaborative process. Hence, authentic assessment tasks require student to collaborate in groups. Collaborative group work effectively fosters both discipline-specific and generic professional attributes if carefully devised and managed. The project team identified common target areas for improvement, constructed and tested a range of practical tools and techniques for improving assessment in these areas, disseminated results and the products to the Media and Communication teaching community and are providing an online forum for on-going evolution, discussion, testing and feedback by the teaching community.

Macquarie University, The University of New South Wales
Final Report Download Document (188.02 KB)

Assessing Graduate Screen Production Outputs in Nineteen Australian Film Schools

Josko Petkovic, Leo Berkeley, Ian Lang, Gillian Leahy, Nick Oughton, Alison Wotherspoon
Murdoch University
2011
Murdoch University
Australian Screen Production, Education and Research Association, Flinders University, Griffith University, RMIT University, The University of Melbourne, University of Technology, Sydney
Final Report Download Document (3.22 MB)

Using Assessment Effectively: Learning Environments that Work for Tertiary Music Performance Students and Staff

Heather Monkhouse
University of Tasmania
2010
University of Tasmania
Fellowship Report Download Document (296.06 KB)

Assessing Individual Learning in Teams: Developing an Assessment Model for Practice-based Curricula in Engineering

Prue Howard, Matt Eliot
CQUniversity
2012
CQUniversity
Aalborg University (Denmark), Swinburne University of Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria University
Final Report Download Document (496.69 KB)

Nationwide Collaborative Assessment of Australian Medical Students

David Wilkinson
The University of Queensland
2014
The University of Queensland
Final Report Download Document (450.71 KB)

Linuxgym: A Sustainable and Easy-to-Use Automated Developmental Assessment Tool for Computer Scripting Skills

Andrew Solomon, Jenny Edwards, Raymond Lister, Judy Kay, John Shepherd
University of Technology, Sydney
2008
University of Technology, Sydney

The project focuses on the adaptation, further development and dissemination of LinuxGym, a system for improving IT students’ scripting skills through automated developmental assessment and feedback. Linuxgym will be both a desktop application and an online library of clearly categorized questions.

The University of Sydney, University of New South Wales
Final Project Report Download Document (667.67 KB)

Improving the Formative and Summative Assessment of Novice Computer Programmers

Raymond Lister, Angela Carbone, Michael de Raadt, Judy Kay, Paul Roe, Richard Thomas
University of Technology, Sydney
2010
University of Technology, Sydney
Monash University, Queensland University of Technology, The University of Sydney, University of Southern Queensland
Final Report Download Document (1.03 MB)

Assessing Students Unfamiliar with Assessment Practices in Australian Universities (Accounting)

Margaret Jackson, Kim Watty, Lynn Yu, Lillian Lowe
RMIT University
2006
RMIT University

Over the last 15 years, the profile of students enrolled in Australian accounting programs has changed dramatically. While professional bodies based their accreditation guidelines on the requirement of equivalency of content and assessment, it is less clear how assessment undertaken by students ensures equivalency.

CPA Australia Ltd, Hong Kong Management Association (Hong Kong), Singapore Institute of Management (Singapore)
Final Report to the Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 2006 Download Document (570.51 KB)
Inclusive Assessment Improving Learning for All: A Manual for Improving Assessment in Accounting Education Download Document (337.08 KB)

Enhancing Assessment Feedback Practices in Accounting Education: Issues, Obstacles and Reforms

Brendan O’Connell, Colin Ferguson, Paul De Lange, Bryan Howieson, Kim Watty, Rodney Carr, Ben Jacobson, Leona Campitelli, Yvonne Gora, Audrey Milton
RMIT University
2010
RMIT University
Deakin University, James Cook University, The University of Adelaide, The University of Melbourne
Final Report Download Document (4.34 MB)

Facilitating Staff and Student Engagement with Graduate Attribute Development, Assessment and Standards in Business Faculties

Tracy Taylor, Darrall Thompson, Lucille Clements, Lynette Simpson, Andrew Paltridge, Marty Fletcher, Mark Freeman, Lesley Treleaven, Romy Lawson, Fiona Rohde
University of Technology, Sydney
2009
University of Technology, Sydney
Queensland University of Technology, The University of Queensland, The University of Sydney
Final Report Download Document (1.54 MB)

Online Assessment Feedback as an Instrument of Reflective Learning Practice in Human Biology

J Meyer, G Fyfe, S Fyfe, M Ziman, J Hill, K Sanders, D Hewitt, Marilyn Bennett-Chambers, R Brightwell, Kayty Plastow, Nicole Koehler, Leith Sly
The University of Western Australia
2008
The University of Western Australia

The project team developed an online assessment system for the improvement of evaluation of Human Biology students’ higher level learning and skill development. The project team sought to address the challenge of teaching large classes, by developing a system which will provide a more sophisticated online dialogue with students and improved individual feedback mechanisms. The assessment system extends the aspects of Human Biology that can be assessed online (including laboratory exercises); provides analytical tools (including sets of exemplars and remedial materials); administers richer, more analytical feedback; and embeds reflective practice and self-performance assessment into the feedback component of the online assessment system. The project team have collaborated with partner institutions who have implemented the online assessment tool, in an effort to share evaluation and feedback and make improvements to the system.

Curtin University, Edith Cowan University
Final Report Download Document (453.97 KB)

Enhancing the Assessment of Learning in Australian Higher Education: Biological Sciences

Kerri-Lee Krause, Kerri-Lee Harris, Robin Garnett, Dawn Gleeson, Mary Peat, Charlotte Taylor
The University of Melbourne
2007
The University of Melbourne

The discipline of biological science encompasses the long standing fields such as zoology, botany and anatomy, along with the more recently defined fields of biochemistry, ecology, genetics, developmental biology and others. Students often take highly general first year programs, later branching into more specialised sub fields. As the number of undergraduate students attracted to science declined steadily in the last decade, there has been a growing concern regarding the qualifications and capacity of teachers, and that of curricula to effectively prepare and enthuse young people for careers in the sciences (Harris et al., 2005). The purpose of this project was to develop and strategically disseminate resources designed to enhance the assessment of learning in the biological sciences in Australian universities. The project involved fieldwork on assessment issues, and studies of current approaches and best practice in eight Australian universities.

The University of Sydney
Final Report Download Document (276.29 KB)

Teachers need to clearly explain assessment requirements and strategies pertinent to their courses within any discipline area. This excellent resource provokes academics firstly, to reflect upon and question what current methods they use to assess students, and secondly, whether they utilise recognised, up-to-date, principles of effective assessment. For early career academics and academics reviewing the curriculum design and content of their teaching courses this resource provides extensive examples of assessment strategies written by academic staff from across Australia (and supported by students’ feedback). Examples provided can be easily downloaded in PDF format, and provide contact details for academics to network with colleagues and share innovative assessment practices. Whilst the resource is complete in itself, there is an open invitation to all academics, students and stakeholders to contribute.  For example, new academic users can easily download a template and submit their own assessment method to UniServe Science to share with colleagues.   This opportunity permits all users to continually update and add content and ideas to the database and disseminate content to the wider academic community that will maintain the sustainability of the resource over an extended period of time. Professional accreditation bodies and stakeholders can clearly view assessment practices and even provide direct feedback. This resource is most informative for undergraduate students studying subject areas in the biological sciences. Students gain better performances in assessments if they clearly understand why and how they are being assessed. Clear explanations of principles of assessments, the types of assessment students need to confront and, the purposes of employing these modes of assessments, provide the student with a better understanding of assessment processes.  As a likely consequence, the student may more effectively achieve learning tasks and desired learning outcomes. Being very user friendly it is easy to navigate to the various components of content.  Each link can be easily opened and content downloaded and the search link is effective. ‘Biological science’ is used in its broadest sense and so one wonders if biological science should be replaced by ‘life sciences’ – particularly as the content is likely to expand greatly as more users contribute.

Good Practice Report: Assessment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Students

John Rice
Australian Learning and Teaching Council Limited
2011
Australian Learning and Teaching Council Limited

This good practice report, commissioned by the ALTC, provides a summative evaluation of useful outcomes and good practices from ALTC projects and fellowships on the assessment of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) students. The report contains:

  • a summative evaluation of the good practices and key outcomes for teaching and learning from completed ALTC projects and fellowships
  • a literature review of the good practices and key outcomes for teaching and learning from national and international research
  • the proposed outcomes and resources for teaching and learning which will be produced by current incomplete ALTC projects and fellowships
  • identifies areas in which further work or development are appropriate.
Report Download Document (596.52 KB)

Developing a Shared Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Standards for Undergraduate Mathematics

Cristina Varsavsky, Deborah King, Carmel Coady, Karen Hogeboom
Monash University
2014
Monash University
The University of Melbourne, University of Western Sydney
Final Report Download Document (1.07 MB)
Guide Download Document (5.64 MB)
Evaluation report Download Document (554.2 KB)

Quality Assessment: Linking Assessment Tasks and Teaching Outcomes in the Social Sciences

Jennifer Gore, James Ladwig, Wendy Elsworth, Hywel Ellis, Robert Parkes, Tom Griffiths
The University of Newcastle
2009
The University of Newcastle
Final Report Download Document (636.62 KB)
Quality Assessment Framework: A Guide for Assessment in Higher Education Download Document (535.62 KB)

 

The report uses the concept of ‘authentic pedagogy’, which has been developed from earlier work. This purports to measure demonstration of disciplinary depth, depth of analysis, richness of communication and the extent to which problematic nature of knowledge is recognised. The report is dense but well referenced and examines correlation between assessment tasks and standards, as well as providing an ‘audit’ of the quality of assessment tasks. It suggests that it provides explicit criteria which lecturers can use to measure specific achievement in their subject area. The sample size is small and self selected; all are in social sciences, except for the odd inclusion of languages. The results are statistically analysed to ensure validity, although the variance may be questionable. 
The assessment task quality descriptors provide a useful framework for those designing assessment tasks although the meta-language criterion is, in the reviewers view, tied to the philosophical underpinnings and may confuse those unfamiliar with it or provide an issue for those who do not accept this stance. The strength of the report lies in the clarity with which the descriptors and the authentic achievement scales are described and in the examples which are included in the report. The results of the study usefully show that tasks which are intellectually challenging and engaging produce work which is consistent with broad academic standards (although these are not  defined).  The approach using a variety of inputs, including workshops, development of a tertiary assessment practice guide and scoring manual make this a much needed additional resource which could assist in improving assessment in universities in the Social Sciences. Its complexity and less obvious applicability for assessment in the humanities may make it less accessible for some academics.

Rethinking Assessment to Enhance Interdisciplinary Collaborative Learning in the Creative Arts and Humanities

Melissa Miles, Sarah Rainbird
Monash University
2013
Monash University
Final Report Download Document (342.79 KB)

Improving Assessment: Understanding Educational Decision-making in Practice

Phillip Dawson, Margaret Bearman
Monash University
2014
Monash University
The University of Queensland, University of Technology, Sydney, University of Wollongong
Final Report Download Document (1.71 MB)
Achievements statement Download Document (1.39 MB)
Guide to the Assessment Design Decisions Framework Download Document (985.41 KB)

Leadership and Assessment: Strengthening the Nexus

Marina Harvey, Sharon Fraser
University of Tasmania
2008
University of Tasmania
Final Report Download Document (962.01 KB)

The Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration: From Proof of Concept to Proof of Sustainability

David Wilkinson, Ben Canny, Daniel Edwards, Jacob Pearce, Hamish Coates, Lambert Schuwirth, Jennifer Schafer, Jean MacNish, Michael Wan, Ian Wilson, Nicky Hudson, Philip Jones, Ray Tedman, Janet McLeod
Macquarie University
2014
Macquarie University
Australian Council for Educational Research, Deakin University, Flinders University, Griffith University, Monash University, The University of New South Wales, The University of Notre Dame Australia, The University of Queensland, University of New England/The University of Newcastle (Joint Medical Program), University of Wollongong
Final Report Download Document (1.16 MB)
Governance Models for Collaborations involving Assessment Download Document (488.09 KB)
Implementing Common Assessment: Lessons and Models from AMAC Download Document (703.4 KB)
Determining the Quality of Assessment Items in Collaborations: Aspects to Discuss to Reach Agreement Download Document (554.87 KB)
Ancilliary Report: Developing a Global Health Assessment Collaboration Download Document (219.01 KB)

Go to pages

You are on page 2